MAIN PAGE
MODIS INFO
INSTRUMENT OPS
Weekly Reports
MODIS History
CALIBRATION
L1B PRODUCT INFO
& STATUS
CONTACTS & STAFF
ON-LINE DOCS
FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS
SITE MAP
SEARCH
RELATED LINKS
MCST DICTIONARY
NASA/GSFC Website Privacy and Security Statement, Disclaimer, and Accessibility Certification
Level 1B
Instrument Performance History
Degradation in RSB (Bands 1 - 19, plus 26)
Description | L1B Impact | L2 Impact | Cause | Mitigation | Schedule | History
DESCRIPTION:
The reflected solar bands show a reduced response over time. Early analyses show the existence of both SD and "scan mirror" degradation.
IMPACT TO L1B DATA SET:
The SD degradation is about 2.5% at 410nm
(Band 8), 1-1.5% at 466nm (Band 3), and 0.5% at 554nm (Band 4) after
the first year of operation. The scan mirror degradation (including
aft optics) is about 7-8% for Band 8, 5% for Band 9, 4% for Band 3,
and 3% for Band 10. There is small degradation for other RSB bands.
Example of degradation in Bands 8 and
9
ESTIMATED IMPACT TO L2 SCIENCE PRODUCTS:
The SD degradation is about 2.5% at 410nm (Band 8), 1-1.5% at 466nm (Band 3), and 0.5% at 554nm (Band 4) after the first year of operation. The scan mirror degradation (including aft optics) is about 7-8% for Band 8, 5% for Band 9, 4% for Band 3, and 3% for Band 10. There is small degradation for other RSB bands.
CAUSE OF EFFECT:
On orbit degradation has been observed frequently in the past. The "common wisdom" is that this degradation is caused by thin film depositions on optics followed by chemical reaction of that film due to ultraviolet exposure. The spectral degradation pattern for Terra is consistent with this scenario. These thin film effects will depend on the angle of incidence of light onto the optics. Consequently, the presence of scan mirror degradation is expected to have an impact on the RVS behavior for MODIS bands below about 600nm. The films are sufficiently thin that effects on the TEB are likely to be insignificant.
MITIGATION APPROACH/ADDED TESTING TO CHARACTERIZE EFFECT:
System degradation, including the SD and scan mirror, can be removed using SD-based calibration. Independent observations of the SD reflectance can be used to distinguish between system degradation and SD degradation. SDSM analysis is being used to distinguish between SD and scan mirror degradation. Effects associated with transmission/attenuation screens that are present in the Solar Diffuser Stability Monitor (SDSM), and effects associated with the deployable screen that is sometimes in front of the SD are being quantified, and may have a minor impact on the inference of the amount of SD degradation. Data taken during a series of spacecraft yaw maneuvers are being used to model SDSM screen characteristics.
ESTIMATED SCHEDULE TO COMPLETE:
The reduced response of the reflected solar bands over time was not accounted for in the algorithm for product versions V2.5.5 or lower. Fixed in version 3.0.0.2 (5/31/01).
HISTORY OF CHARACTERISTIC:
| Epoch Number |
Time Span | Version Number at start of epoch |
General Characteristics | Improvements | Documentation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feb. 24, 2000 - Oct. 30, 2000 2000055.1550 - 2000304.1427 |
2.3.2.0 | The reflected solar bands (1-19, 26) show a reduced response over time. | Step function gain updates based on SD, SDSM studies were applied to the data. | |
| 2 | Oct. 30, 2000 - present 2000304.1427 - present |
2.4.4.1 | Linearly interpolated gain updates were applied. | MsWG material, August 15, 2001. |
Description | L1B Impact | L2 Impact | Cause | Mitigation | Schedule | History
Please contact Jack Xiong with any technical questions concerning these pages.
Responsible Civil Servant:
Dr. Jack Xiong <Xiaoxiong.Xiong.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Email mcst-webm@ssaihq.com to report any problem with the MCST Web Pages.
Last Update: July 1, 2008